Issues Replicating Bioinformatics Papers.
Thoughts on a new approach to viral testing.Playing with a Handycam CCD-F340 Viewfinder CRT Notes.Sony CCD-V30 Camera Viewfinder CRT Notes.Sony CCD-V8AF Video Camera Recorder – Viewfinder CRT Notes.Scripts to download SARS-CoV-2 replacements.Are there mutations in SARS-CoV-2 CDC qPCR Primer Sites?.QuantumSi’s Protein Sequencing Approach.The $15 Genome through reduced reagents.Genome Analyzer Quantum GEM 532nm Laser and filters.Single Dye Experiments on a Genome Analyzer.Photobeaching on the Genome Analyzer, using a IMX178.Dreampore – Nanopore Protein Sequencing.Beckman DU530 Photospectrometer (Hach DR4000?) Photodiode Amplifier Board.Beckman DU530 Spectrophotometer CFL Spectra.Bio-rad SmartSpec Plus Spectrophotometer.Inside the Lucira Check It COVID-19 Test.Ubuntu 20.04 Fujitsu FAREHT1 Mouse/Touch Screen Fixes.
Probability of choosing at least one target It seems that switching the imaged value to “amplitude” (amplitude of what if not effective height I don’t know) seemed to produce much better images like that shown above. They didn’t come out very well to my mind. These two images were taken in “height” mode. The videos below document the process I used to get these images: Cantilever installation, laser alignment and the imaging process is non-trivial. The feature size seems to be around 200 to 700nm which seems about right for 90s tech. The image above shows some of the features I assume on the upper metal layer of the FPGA. As a first test I wanted to try something with quite large feature sizes, I had no calibration standard so acquired some used wafers (in this case a late 90s FPGA (ProASIC)) with relatively large features as an initial test. I’ve not had any formal training on an AFM (Atomic Force Microscope) so I’m feeling my way as I go. Today I decided to get the AFM I have here up and running.
0 kommentar(er)
